The Execution Layer: Why AI Automation Breaks in Production

Where BPS Cloud sits (and why that matters)

BPS Cloud is the execution layer between “what the business wants” and “what production can safely run.”

flowchart TD
  Business["Business outcomes + stakeholders"] --> Req["Requirements + risk decisions + acceptance criteria"]
  Req --> Exec["BPS Cloud Execution Layer
(Assess → Build → Operate)"]
  Exec --> Systems["Your systems
(apps, workflows, identity, data, cloud/on-prem)"]

This is the missing layer that stops automation from becoming brittle glue-code and “demo ware,” and turns it into something your team can actually operate long-term.

What BPS Cloud delivers (in plain English)

BPS Cloud is built for production: clean handoffs, documented systems, and operational readiness from day one. You get:

Scope clarity: outcomes + acceptance criteria defined up front so delivery doesn’t drift.
Automation that sticks: integrations & workflows built for real operating conditions.
Operational readiness: monitoring, runbooks, and handoffs so the system can be run long-term.

The BPS delivery pattern: Assess → Build → Operate

BPS uses a repeatable delivery pattern that keeps scope clear and execution predictable.

BPS Assess

Audit + roadmap that de-risks delivery and leaves you with an executable plan.

What it solves

Unclear scope and shifting requirements
Tool-first buying with no operating clarity
Automation that breaks in production

flowchart TD
  A["Map workflows + systems"] --> B["Prioritize automations"]
  B --> C["Deliver roadmap + backlog"]
  C --> D["Operational readiness checklist"]

What you receive: outcomes & success metrics, system inventory, integration touchpoints, risk register, prioritized backlog, and an operational readiness checklist.

BPS Build

Ship usable capability in small slices—integrations, workflows, and controls that operate reliably.

flowchart TD
  X["Define scope + acceptance criteria"] --> Y["Deliver in usable slices"]
  Y --> Z["Document + handoff cleanly"]
  Z --> X

What we build: workflow automation, data pipelines & governance basics, operational controls (access, logging, monitoring).

BPS Operate

Run and improve the system: monitoring, support, change control, and continuous improvement.

flowchart LR
  O[Observe] --> P[Detect]
  P --> Q[Triage]
  Q --> R[Mitigate]
  R --> S[Resolve]
  S --> T[Postmortem + improvements]
  T --> O

How to choose the right entry point

BPS packages exist for one reason: start where you need the most impact.

If scope is unclear → Assess.
If you have priorities and want to ship → Build.
If you already launched and need stability → Operate.

Call to action

If you want a plan that prevents drift, start with BPS Assess.
If you want it built to survive production, choose BPS Build.
If you want it stable long-term, lock in BPS Operate.

Request a plan